Thought the following would be of interested to those riding airhead
BMWs
Begin included message #1 - This was from me to Rick Jones
at Motorrad Elektrik over the weekend
Bought some of your solid mounts for my '92 R100 GS/PD a few weeks
ago. I finally got around to installing them this weekend.
During the install I had a question about some wear on the teeth on
the flywheel that caused me to call my trusty local BMW shop. During the conversation I
mentioned that I was into the starter area to remove the rubber mounts and replace them
with your product. Their immediate reaction was "WHOA! don't do that. BMW used
solid mounts for a while in the '70s and found that the vibration killed the diode boards.
That's why they went with rubber isolated ones." Further, they said that your product
might cause damage by heat expansion of aluminum cracking the diode board mount holes.
Also, during disassembly I discovered that the upper left rubber
mount is already broken and thus must be replaced no matter what.
Now I'm quite concerned. I'm sure you wouldn't sell this product if
it were worse than the stock install so I'm hoping for some reassurance from you.
Have you ever heard (and I assume you would if it was a problem) of
your solid mounts causing cracking of the diode board because of heat expansion of the
aluminum heat sinks?
Have you any experience with whether your mounts cause vibration
failures so that I should go back to rubber and simply install a better grounding harness?
I've currently got the bike disassembled. I'm worried about
installing your product but must wait to go to the shop on Monday to get new rubber ones
if that's the route I should go.
Though it is a weekend, I'd greatly appreciated hearing from you if
possible.
Included Message #2 - Rick's reply to me.
Hi Brooks!
I have just two words about using solid diode mounts: no worries!
Solidly mounting the diode board to the engine was the way this part
was originally designed from the inception of the type 247 boxer. In my 25 years of
working on these motorcycles professionally, it has become apparent that a large number of
the old /5-6-7 models out there are still running around with the original (Bosch) diode
board fitted. The rubber mounts came out first on the R-90S models, which were expected to
spend hours at high speeds, and with their relatively short gearing this translated to
higher RPM running. Vibration concerns originated here.
Also, BMW saw fit to solidly mount the diode board on ALL R-80GS
models from '81-87, after having had rubber mounts on all other models since at least
1978. Why would they go backwards from their "new, improved" rubber mount
design? And especially on a smaller displacement engine, with short off-road gearing which
insures a higher-revving engine and thus more vibration? I suspect it was because they
knew these bikes might spend a lot of time off-road, turning fewer revs which profoundly
affects charging on the type 247.
In an attempt to get the best possible charging under these
conditions, one would hope to have the best heat dissipation possible from the chassis of
the diode board, which is also intended to be a heat sink for getting rid of the heat
created as a result of electrical activity through the diodes. The higher the temperature
of any electrical device, the lower its efficiency. The only damages to a diode board as a
result of vibration that I have ever seen were the result of solder joints actually
melting and vibrating the solder out because of the shaking on the rubber mounts. The
rubber mounting system insures two things that increase heat problems: Poor grounding and
no heat dissipation from the chassis. The external ground wires used by the factory are,
and always have been, inadequate. Even the "updated" ground harness that
attaches to the main crankcase casting is still deficient, as evidenced by their
chronically "cooked" condition. The rubber mounting system also hangs the diode
board out in the air, which is a very efficient insulator. With no air circulation under
the front cover, as was designed into the round air cleaner models, the diode board has NO
ability to dissipate the heat from electrical activity and from high resistance path, poor
grounds. I, too have seen plenty of diode boards with cracking of the phenolic material
which is used in the construction of the diode boards. However, it is NOT from thermal
expansion issues, but from extreme, chronic overheating of the diode board, especially
from the two upper mounting holes where the two inadequate ground wires attach. This
chronic overheating explains why the upper two rubber mounts fail very frequently, while
the lower two will rarely be found failed.
Ultimately, the proof is in the performance. In over two years of
sales of my mounting kit, I have had not one complaint or report of failure from my very
satisfied customers. Typically, feedback has been nothing but positive, with typical
reports of better charging than before the mounts were fitted. Please forgive my lengthy
dissertation, but I feel compelled to defend what I know to be a good product in the face
of misinformation.
I'm not an engineer, but I have been making a living working on
these machines for a long time, and I know what I see. Thanks again for your purchase, and
please let me know if I can be of further help.
Cheers, Rick Jones
Rick's reply was quick and to the point. This is the sort of great
service we have a right to expect and I'd encourage you to support Rick's outfit.
(Motorrad Elektrik)
Brooks Cooper '92 R 100 GS/PD